West Cornwall has an incredible landscape, rich in natural beauty, ancient monuments and industrial heritage. Here are some photos I took on a recent trip.





I've been keeping an interested eye over the past year on a unique (for the moment) planting scheme behind the new glass house at the RHS Garden at Wisley. Different, because there is no planting plan to speak of, interested because 'What? No planting plan? I'm going to go out of business!' There is actually no plan in terms of 'this plant here, that plant there'. Instead the planning is the choice of seed mix. (Yes, seeds, remember them?) James Hitchmough of Sheffield University has been busy for many years developing reliable mixes of perennial plants that can be grown as an annual meadow. The results are nothing less than spectacular. All the plants were apparently transported to the site in Prof. Hitchmough's pocket. With some basic ground preparation and little to no maintenance, a remarkable planting scheme has taken shape.
By creating layers of plants, i.e. mostly ground cover, with some medium high 'pretties' and a few taller species with bare stems, a fully structured scheme, without the taller varieties shading the lower ones, is created. From spring into late summer a constantly changing array of beautiful and natural looking (but mostly N American prairie) plants come into flower, so that the area is constantly changing, evolving through the seasons. Even in Autumn you have the structure of the dying stems. Possibly the closest thing to 'all year round interest', an over used (and nearly always impossible) phrase I run into over and over again.
I predict, and hope, that this sort of scheme will begin to infiltrate our public spaces and push out the hideous, high maintenance, expensive displays of routine bedding plants that blight roundabouts and parks country wide (this might be a personal view, but luckily for me, I'm right). If we could bring back perennials to these places, local authorities would not only save money but much larger areas could be planted, rather that a few square meters of neon primroses. Sorry to swear, but primroses... Why?
What is it about Birches? Why do I keep specifying them in my designs and photographing them in 'the wild' at parks and gardens? Whether it's the sheer brilliant white of the Himalayan Birch, (Betula utilis, especially variant Jaquemontii) outside the Tate Modern or a forest of native Betula pendula in the Surrey downs, they look stunning and yet completely natural in so many different settings. The Maclaren racing headquarters outside Woking has the most amazing forest of Jaquemontiis set out in a rigid grid pattern by their main entrance. It is so eye catching I have nearly crashed my car on a number of occasions while passing, bewitched by the strobing white lines of the trunks.
I am often drawn, when in a melancholy mood, to Chobham Common to walk in this slightly 'other worldly' landscape of rare Surrey lowland heath. Here native Birches can be seen at their pioneering best (or worst depending on your outlook). The heathland is under constant threat from gorse, pine and Betula pendula. This fast growing, pioneering nature of the Birch means they are relatively short-lived as a species and so are not what I would describe as 'legacy trees'. In fact, you could easily plant a birch and watch it mature and die in your own lifetime. When specifing trees I like to think that once planted they are going to be there for some time, long after the owners and myself are no longer around to appreciate them. Obviously I have no power over what people or the environment may decide for a particular specimen in years to come, but with short lived trees we have no choice in the matter. Still, I like birches too much to let this become an issue. Besides, a 40 year life span for a feature in a garden should be considered most generous.
It seems not many people are interested in thinking ten years down the line, let alone 50 or a 100. This is perhaps understandable in a mobile society where we don't generally hand properties down through the generations like a 'Capabilty Brown' estate. In public spaces however, we should most definitely be thinking long term and planting majestic trees for future generations. Unfortunately many local authorities are too scared of roots disrupting pavements and foundations so all too often they choose to plant shorter lived, relatively small trees. Where will the majestic London plane and chestnut trees in our towns and cities be in the future? Private gardens mostly. We should plant great trees for the future in our gardens as much as we plant beautiful groves of birches, remembering that these are but fleeting ghosts that take advantage of open space till the giants take over.
The name 'Wistman' derives from the local word wisht which has supernatural connotations, as in eerie or wraithlike.
The sparsity of woodland on the moor is mostly due to human activity thousands of years ago, clearing the trees for agriculture. By burning the trees these early settlers unwittingly created the acid peat bogs we see today. This in turn made the moor unsuitable for crops and the area was depopulated until mining brought people back to moor centuries later. However in three small areas the trees survive, protected from grazing and wind by clefts in the land. Wistman's Wood is perhaps the most famous of these, which I first came across in Archie Miles' excellent book 'Silva' a few years ago.
In passing Wistman's Wood you could be forgiven for taking little notice of the unprepossessing nature and stature of the trees. Delving into the copse and you see that the roots of the trees writhe and intertwine over granite boulders ('clitter') while being thickly covered with the rarest of lichens, mosses and liverworts. The stunted, contorted trunks lead to bowers that drip with ferns. Certainly you get a feeling of immense age amongst these small Pendunulate Oaks (Quercus robur) and arborists estimate some specimens to be at least a thousand years old.
As a landscape designer I often fear that too many people do not not really 'see' their surroundings at all, especially in urban areas. In Dartmoor you cannot help, but 'see' the landscape. Grand new vistas leap up at you around each bend and over every hill, each one as arresting as the last. Great granite tors tearing through the earth atop their smooth boggy hills. Ancient settlements and stone circles litter the area while the man made leats still carry clear water across the moor, often appearing to defy gravity.
Beauty is in the EOTB of course, but the finding of beauty (or not?) in a landscape reveals much more of the beholder, than might be imagined. Dartmoor is not a safe or comfortable landscape to look at. It can be cold and bleak, and looks it too. This could be unsettling for some people, just as forests, and therefore trees, may signify darkness and beasts to others. Understanding the emotional reaction that people have to their surrounding is key to designing the right space for them. Asking a client where they feel most comfortable may be a better question than 'what colour flowers do you like' or 'what's your favourite tree?' Get the psychology right and the garden will follow.